Does “Notice & Access” Really Save Companies Money?

Our guest – Toppan Merrill’s Mike Spelman – joins us to map out how the Notice & Access model might not be a cost-effective one for some in the corporate community as it currently stands.

This is due to the way that processing fees are structured. His reviews repeatedly show that N&A costs are as much, or more, than the costs of mailing full set.

So even though companies using N&A think they are going to save, they wind up spending a bunch on secondary mailings (since the recipient of a Notice of Internet Availability is not likely to vote, according to Broadridge stats) and solicitation fees.

For many more Vid-Guides dealing with corporate & securities law, corporate governance, E&S issues and more – particularly if you want to review any Vid-Guides referred to during this Vid-Guide – see the list of Vid-Guides spread throughout these categories:

• Corporate Governance
• Proxy Season
• Executive Pay
• ’34 Act/Other
• ’33 Act/Deals
• Sustainability/E&S
• Career Advice
• Fun Party

And since all the content on ZippyPoint.com is complimentary, please “Pay-What-You-Can” to help keep this fine platform alive & well…