Does “Notice & Access” Really Save Companies Money?

Toppan Merrill’s Mike Spelman joins us to map out how the Notice & Access model might not be a cost-effective one for some in the corporate community as it currently stands.

This is due to the way that processing fees are structured. His reviews repeatedly show that N&A costs are as much, or more, than the costs of mailing full set.

So even though companies using N&A think they are going to save, they wind up spending a bunch on secondary mailings (since the recipient of a Notice of Internet Availability is not likely to vote, according to Broadridge stats) and solicitation fees.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Like what you're seeing?

Pay-What-You-Can

Zippy Point is a community-funded site - to keep making great content, we rely on your generosity. Please "pay-what-you-can" today.